🔗 Share this article

The beloved novelist Jilly Cooper, who died suddenly at the age of 88, racked up sales of eleven million volumes of her assorted sweeping books over her 50-year writing career. Adored by all discerning readers over a specific age (forty-five), she was introduced to a new generation last year with the TV adaptation of Rivals.

The Beloved Series

Cooper purists would have preferred to watch the Rutshire chronicles in sequence: starting with Riders, originally published in the mid-80s, in which the infamous Rupert Campbell-Black, cad, charmer, rider, is initially presented. But that’s a sidebar – what was notable about viewing Rivals as a complete series was how brilliantly Cooper’s world had stood the test of time. The chronicles distilled the 1980s: the shoulder pads and voluminous skirts; the fixation on status; aristocrats sneering at the flashy new money, both overlooking everyone else while they snipped about how warm their sparkling wine was; the gender dynamics, with harassment and assault so commonplace they were virtually characters in their own right, a duo you could rely on to advance the story.

While Cooper might have lived in this era fully, she was never the classic fish not perceiving the ocean because it’s everywhere. She had a humanity and an keen insight that you might not expect from listening to her speak. All her creations, from the dog to the equine to her mother and father to her foreign exchange sibling, was always “absolutely sweet” – unless, that is, they were “truly heavenly”. People got assaulted and further in Cooper’s work, but that was never OK – it’s astonishing how OK it is in many supposedly sophisticated books of the era.

Background and Behavior

She was upper-middle-class, which for practical purposes meant that her dad had to hold down a job, but she’d have defined the classes more by their mores. The bourgeoisie anxiously contemplated about all things, all the time – what others might think, mostly – and the upper classes didn’t care a … well “stuff”. She was spicy, at times extremely, but her prose was never coarse.

She’d recount her upbringing in storybook prose: “Father went to Dunkirk and Mom was deeply concerned”. They were both completely gorgeous, involved in a enduring romance, and this Cooper replicated in her own marriage, to a publisher of military histories, Leo Cooper. She was 24, he was 27, the relationship wasn’t without hiccups (he was a philanderer), but she was never less than at ease giving people the formula for a blissful partnership, which is noisy mattress but (crucial point), they’re squeaking with all the laughter. He avoided reading her books – he tried Prudence once, when he had flu, and said it made him feel more ill. She wasn't bothered, and said it was reciprocated: she wouldn’t be spotted reading battle accounts.

Forever keep a diary – it’s very challenging, when you’re twenty-five, to recall what being 24 felt like

The Romance Series

Prudence (1978) was the fifth installment in the Romance collection, which began with Emily in 1975. If you came to Cooper from the later works, having started in the main series, the Romances, alternatively called “the books named after affluent ladies” – also Imogen and Harriet – were almost there, every male lead feeling like a test-run for Rupert, every heroine a little bit drippy. Plus, chapter for chapter (Without exact data), there wasn't the same quantity of sex in them. They were a bit uptight on matters of propriety, women always fretting that men would think they’re promiscuous, men saying outrageous statements about why they preferred virgins (comparably, ostensibly, as a true gentleman always wants to be the first to break a container of Nescafé). I don’t know if I’d advise reading these books at a impressionable age. I assumed for a while that that’s what posh people actually believed.

They were, however, incredibly tightly written, effective romances, which is considerably tougher than it sounds. You felt Harriet’s surprise baby, Bella’s difficult relatives, Emily’s remote Scottish life – Cooper could take you from an all-is-lost moment to a windfall of the soul, and you could not ever, even in the early days, pinpoint how she managed it. At one moment you’d be chuckling at her meticulously detailed descriptions of the bedding, the next you’d have emotional response and no idea how they appeared.

Literary Guidance

Questioned how to be a novelist, Cooper used to say the kind of thing that Ernest Hemingway would have said, if he could have been bothered to assist a novice: use all all of your faculties, say how things scented and looked and sounded and touched and palatable – it greatly improves the narrative. But probably more useful was: “Forever keep a diary – it’s very challenging, when you’re twenty-five, to recollect what age 24 felt like.” That’s one of the primary realizations you detect, in the more extensive, more populated books, which have numerous female leads rather than just one, all with extremely posh names, unless they’re Stateside, in which case they’re called a simple moniker. Even an generational gap of a few years, between two relatives, between a man and a woman, you can perceive in the speech.

An Author's Tale

The backstory of Riders was so exactly Jilly Cooper it couldn't possibly have been accurate, except it absolutely is real because a major newspaper ran an appeal about it at the period: she wrote the complete book in 1970, long before the Romances, brought it into the downtown and forgot it on a public transport. Some context has been deliberately left out of this anecdote – what, for example, was so crucial in the urban area that you would abandon the only copy of your novel on a public transport, which is not that different from forgetting your baby on a transport? Undoubtedly an rendezvous, but what kind?

Cooper was wont to amp up her own disorder and ineptitude