🔗 Share this article

US legal authorities have stated that a Libyan national man willingly confessed to taking part in attacks directed at US citizens, comprising the 1988 Pan Am Flight 103 incident and an failed conspiracy to kill a US government official using a explosive-laden coat.

Confession Information

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is said to have acknowledged his involvement in the killing of 270 people when Flight 103 was destroyed over the Scottish community of Lockerbie, during questioning in a Libya's holding center in the year 2012.

Referred to as the suspect, the elderly man has stated that three masked persons pressured him to deliver the admission after menacing him and his loved ones.

His legal representatives are trying to stop it from being utilized as proof in his trial in DC next year.

Courtroom Dispute

In response, attorneys from the American justice department have stated they can demonstrate in the courtroom that the confession was "willing, trustworthy and accurate."

The presence of the defendant's claimed confession was originally made public in 2020, when the American authorities declared it was charging him with building and preparing the IED utilized on Flight 103.

Legal Team Claims

The defendant is alleged of being a former high-ranking officer in Libya's secret service and has been in US detention since recent years.

He has pleaded innocent to the charges and is due to face trial at the federal court for the District of Columbia in the coming months.

The defendant's lawyers are working to stop the jury from being informed about the confession and have filed a motion asking for it to be excluded.

They argue it was acquired under pressure following the uprising which removed Colonel Gaddafi in 2011.

Alleged Intimidation

They claim previous personnel of the leader's regime were being victimized with illegal deaths, seizures and abuse when the defendant was taken from his dwelling by armed individuals the subsequent year.

He was transported to an unregistered detention center where additional prisoners were reportedly abused and abused and was alone in a tiny room when several hooded individuals handed him a one page of paper.

His lawyers said its handwritten details began with an command that he was to confess to the Pan Am Flight 103 attack and another violent act.

Substantial Extremist Attacks

The suspect states he was told to remember what it stated about the events and recite it when he was interviewed by another person the following morning.

Fearing for his well-being and that of his offspring, he stated he thought he had no option but to acquiesce.

In their reply to the defense's petition, lawyers from the US Department of Justice have declared the tribunal was being asked to withhold "highly pertinent testimony" of the suspect's guilt in "several substantial extremist attacks against Americans."

Prosecution Counterarguments

They assert the defendant's story of occurrences is unbelievable and false, and argue that the contents of the confession can be verified by credible external testimony gathered over several decades.

The legal authorities claim the defendant and other ex- personnel of the former leader's secret service were kept in a covert detention facility run by a armed group when they were interviewed by an seasoned Libya's police officer.

They argue that in the chaos of the post-revolution period, the location was "the protected environment" for the suspect and the fellow personnel, given the violence and resistance attitude prevailing at the period.

Interrogation Particulars

Based to the investigator who interviewed Mas'ud, the location was "properly managed", the prisoners were not confined and there were no evidence of torture or coercion.

The investigator has claimed that over 48 hours, a composed and fit defendant described his involvement in the attacks of the aircraft.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has also claimed he had acknowledged building a explosive which detonated in a West Berlin venue in the mid-1980s, causing the deaths of several people, including several US soldiers, and injuring many others.

Further Claims

He is also alleged to have recounted his involvement in an plot on the life of an unidentified US Secretary of State at a public event in the Asian country.

The defendant is reported to have explained that a person with the American politician was wearing a booby-trapped overcoat.

It was the suspect's assignment to activate the device but he chose not to do so after discovering that the person wearing the garment did not know he was on a suicide mission.

He decided "not to push the button" even though his supervisor in the agency being present at the moment and questioning what was {going on|happening|occurring